Will NY lawyers lose blogging privlieges?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (3)

NY Sun: Proposed Attorney Advertising Rules Could Place Restrictions on Web Logs "The proposed rules, announced in June, are intended to protect consumers from misleading advertisements and to sanction unseemly and aggressive forms of advertising such as the solicitation of plaintiffs in the wake of major disasters.Among other things, the rules would require attorneys to submit advertisements for review by a court disciplinary committee."

Julie Hilden, Findlaw's Writ: Are Lawyers' Blogs Protected by the First Amendment? "It would be a grave mistake, however, for bars to begin equating blogs with advertisements, and treating them the same. Rules regulating attorney advertising are pernicious and elitist to begin with; they shouldn't be expanded. And characterizing blogs as merely advertising for the attorney who writes them is so reductive as to be absurd."

Leave a comment

3 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Will NY lawyers lose blogging privlieges?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/4086

» artist ,released ,wholesale ,barnyard ,ny from artist ,released ,wholesale ,barnyard ,ny
» ny ,roper ,hard ,converter ,the from ny ,roper ,hard ,converter ,the
» ny ,roper ,hard ,converter ,the from ny ,roper ,hard ,converter ,the

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on October 18, 2006 6:52 PM.

Calling Elvis's Ringtone was the previous entry in this blog.

Gnarls Barkley goes to court is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01