The facts

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (1)

James Grimmelman delves into the details of the facts that led to Google v. Parker, 422 F. Supp. 2d 492 (E.D. Pa. 2006). A Little Lawsuit Backstory: "In short, this was not a suit against Google because Google seemed like a rich defendant. It was not a suit trying to stop search engine caching. It was a highly personal dispute that spilled out of USENET and is more about ego, reputation, and attribution than about any more rarified legal matters."

Categories

Leave a comment

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The facts.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/4070

» portland ,classic ,downloads ,sale ,james from portland ,classic ,downloads ,sale ,james

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on October 11, 2006 1:23 PM.

Trademark Dilution Act was the previous entry in this blog.

Educating fair use is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01