McCarthy on Dilution

| | TrackBacks (0)

J. Thomas McCarthy, Dilution of a Trademark, European and United States Law Compared, The Trademark Reporter, International Trademark Association.

This article is a comparison of the laws that govern dilution in Europe and the United States.... While the anti-dilution provisions of Articles 4(4)(a) and 5(2) of the E.U. Directive are “optional,” in fact, every pre-2004 E.U. nation has adopted them in its domestic law. In the United States, since the enactment of the 1996 federal anti-dilution Act, in theory there is a uniform law consistent throughout the nation. The European Directive achieves simplicity by harmonizing statutory dilution law among the European nations. But in the United States, the International Trademark Association (INTA) has opposed the federal preemption of diverse state anti-dilution laws. In the United States there is a confused mélange of some 35 state anti-dilution laws with the federal law superimposed on top.

Categories

,

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: McCarthy on Dilution.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/3363

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on January 20, 2005 10:24 PM.

Is copyright killing culture? was the previous entry in this blog.

Microsoft losing war on spam is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01