More E-Vote Issues

| | TrackBacks (0)

In Popular Science, Sorry, Your Vote Has Been: Lost, Hacked, Miscast, Recorded Twice

Ironically, it was the ambiguity of the old-fashioned paper trail that forced officials to put their trust in electronic machines. After the 2000 election hung literally by a chad, Congress passed the 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA). It included a $3.9-billion payout to improve the country’s voting infrastructure, with most of that aimed directly at converting those pesky punch-card devices into shiny new e-voting machines. The catch: States that wanted a piece of the pie would have to upgrade before 2006. Historically accustomed to a chronic lack of funding, state elections officials were eager to bring the voting process into the 21st century. “There was a mad rush to go to [e-voting machines] in the wake of HAVA,” says computer scientist Michael Shamos of Carnegie Mellon University. “But people didn’t know the machines. They didn’t have a clue.”

Ed Felten on Bad Protocol, Another Broken Diebold Protocol and Preemptive Blame-Shifting by the E-Voting Industry: "The November 2nd election hasn't even happened yet, and already the e-voting industry is making excuses for the election-day failures of their technology. That's right -- they're rebutting future reports of future failures."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: More E-Vote Issues.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/3056

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on October 20, 2004 11:39 PM.

American Detained Over VoIP in Belarus was the previous entry in this blog.

Is P2P dying? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0