NYT on Grokster

NY Times: EDITORIAL: Grokster and the Information Exchange

But the broader issue is the distribution of information. Software like Grokster creates a network of independent Internet users who can access one another's computer files without going through a central server. (Napster maintained a central server, which made it legally liable in very different ways.) Grokster can certainly be used to swap music illegally. But it can also be used to exchange electronic copies of books already in the public domain, transcripts of Congressional hearings or any number of other legitimate types of information. Much like a VCR that does not distinguish between a pirated tape and one legally acquired, the technology does not care what is shared. It is impossible to strike down software like Grokster for its use in illegal file-sharing without also destroying its capacity for legal and socially beneficial activities.

About

A work in progress

Recent Entries

The best fan video in the world?
Via Top Gear's blog, I found this link to a fan-made Top Gear style search for the beat driving road…
Shatner, Montalban, iPod and Kindle
Dvice tests out the range of expression in the text-to-speech systems in the Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle by having…
A F#*&ing brilliant Supreme Court ruling?
The Supreme Court released its ruling in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, et al. (07-582), in which a 5-4 majority…