NYT on Grokster

| | TrackBacks (0)

NY Times: EDITORIAL: Grokster and the Information Exchange

But the broader issue is the distribution of information. Software like Grokster creates a network of independent Internet users who can access one another's computer files without going through a central server. (Napster maintained a central server, which made it legally liable in very different ways.) Grokster can certainly be used to swap music illegally. But it can also be used to exchange electronic copies of books already in the public domain, transcripts of Congressional hearings or any number of other legitimate types of information. Much like a VCR that does not distinguish between a pirated tape and one legally acquired, the technology does not care what is shared. It is impossible to strike down software like Grokster for its use in illegal file-sharing without also destroying its capacity for legal and socially beneficial activities.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: NYT on Grokster.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/2828

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on August 30, 2004 6:36 PM.

Paper Trail Chase was the previous entry in this blog.

Not in the law? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01