Filter this

| | TrackBacks (0)

NY Times: Internet Filters Are: [Good] [Bad] [Both]

In a case decided by the Supreme Court last week, the American Civil Liberties Union had argued that Internet filters are a great way to protect children from pornographic material online. But in a case decided by the Supreme Court last year, the A.C.L.U. argued against a law requiring filters in schools and libraries, and the organization attacked filters in a 1997 paper that said "rating and blocking proposals may torch free speech on the Internet."
Requiring filters dissuades free speech, but the availability of filtering software promotes free speech more than censorship.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Filter this.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/2507

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on July 6, 2004 5:13 PM.

CAN-SPAM in effect was the previous entry in this blog.

State FOI Laws is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0