The Act formerly known as Induce

Ernest Miller: The Obsessively Annotated Introduction to the INDUCE Act

News roundup at FurdLog: IICA (née INDUCE) Act Coverage

Chirs Rush Cohen: INDUCE Act inducing me to do lots of research

EFF lawyers drafted a fake complaint which could be filed if the Induce Act passes: Prelude to a Fake Complaint

When the lawyers at EFF first sat down and asked "Whom could we sue under the Induce Act if we were an abusive copyright holder?" the answer was clear: pretty much everybody. Playing the devil's advocates, we knew we could draft a legal complaint against any number of the major computer or electronics manufacturers for selling everyday devices we all know and love—CD burners, MP3 players, cell phones—and that with that complaint, we could file a lawsuit that would survive any attempt to dismiss it before trial, costing the targeted company up to $1,000,000 per month in legal fees alone. The Induce Act is a nasty, brutish stick in the hands of the wrong plaintiff.

About

A work in progress

Recent Entries

The best fan video in the world?
Via Top Gear's blog, I found this link to a fan-made Top Gear style search for the beat driving road…
Shatner, Montalban, iPod and Kindle
Dvice tests out the range of expression in the text-to-speech systems in the Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle by having…
A F#*&ing brilliant Supreme Court ruling?
The Supreme Court released its ruling in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, et al. (07-582), in which a 5-4 majority…