Microsoft v. Mike Rowe Soft

By Andrew Raff on January 19, 2004 2:56 PM | | TrackBacks (0)

Website row pits B.C. teen against Microsoft

It took a while for Microsoft to come after Mike Rowe Soft, but on Nov. 19, Rowe got an e-mail from law firm Smart & Biggar, claiming he was infringing copyright and demanding that he transfer his domain name to Microsoft.

Infringing copyright? This sounds like trademark and cybersquatting claims, not copyright.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Microsoft v. Mike Rowe Soft.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/1610

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on January 19, 2004 2:56 PM.

Do record labels fail to respect copyright? was the previous entry in this blog.

Secrecy as a campaign issue is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed
Powered by Movable Type 4.01

Search