Do record labels fail to respect copyright?

| | TrackBacks (0)

News.com: Rights issue dogs CD protection

At issue are "double session" CDs that include two versions of each song on a disc, formatted for playback on different kinds of devices. The most widely distributed type are copy-protected discs that prevent CD tracks from being copied to a hard drive, but that also include a digital version of the songs, often in Microsoft's Windows Media format, that can be transferred to a computer or portable digital music player.

Music publishers and songwriters, who are entitled to payments of a few cents for every copy of a song sold, contend that since these double-format discs hold two copies of songs, they should be paid for both copies. They've been negotiating with record labels for months, but already hundreds of millions of discs have been released around the world, raising the possibility of huge back payments.

Enrest Miller sums up: "Of course, the irony of engaging in blatant copyright infringement in order to reduce copyright infringement is off the charts."

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Do record labels fail to respect copyright?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/1585

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on January 15, 2004 9:47 AM.

Blame Canada was the previous entry in this blog.

Microsoft v. Mike Rowe Soft is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01