Senate votes against spam

| | TrackBacks (0)

NY Times: Antispam Bill Passes Senate by Voice Vote.

Via Prof. Lessig, CongressDaily reports that Senator Corzine (Dn-NJ) plans on holding up the pro-spam “anti-spam” bill to insist that the FTC at least study the viability of bounties as part of the solution to spam.

From the House side, Silicon Valley lawmakers think Spam bill is a turkey

Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D.-CA) and Mike Honda (D.-CA) said they voted against the landmark anti-spam bill because the legislation is simply not tough enough and that consumers deserve better. Both said they support the stricter standards of their state's recently passed anti-spam law, an opt-in measure that allows individual consumers to sue spammers.

Here, Congress gets to look good, by voting for a bill that is intended to stop spam, which no one likes. But, the bill is severely flawed and will likely be ineffective at best and will probably increase the amount of spam clogging inboxes around the US. (See CAN SPAM Act can't stop spam

Categories

Spam

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Senate votes against spam.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.iptablog.org/emtee/mt-tb.cgi/1421

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Andrew Raff published on November 26, 2003 6:38 PM.

Diebold's done was the previous entry in this blog.

Colour trademarks is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0